|
medline, fat black girls , kidney failure, fatty mcblog , 24 7 fat girls , fatty infiltration liver , alcohol related liver disease, gastritis, edema, nude fat girls , plump models , nephrotic syndrome, spider angiomas, gynecomastia, refsum disease, plump fiction , girls with fat ass , starvation, alcohol induced fatty liver, acute fatty liver of pregnancy , queen fat bottom girls , trauma, adverse drug reactions, ncbi,
|
Radiology 1999; 213:86-91. 3. Urban BA, McGhie PA, Fishman EK. plump lip Helical CT: diagnostic pitfalls of arterial phase imaging of the upper abdomen. AJR plump lip 2000; 174:455-461 4. Horton KM, Fishman EK. The liver: helical (spiral) and conventional CT. In: Shirkhoda A, ed. Variants and pitfalls in body imaging. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000; 193-218. Table 1: Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values with corresponding 95% plump lip confidence interval for each of the 3 reviewers Statistics Value (confidence interval) Reviewer 1 Sensitivity 0.692 (0.629, 0.750) Specificity 0.909 (0.822, 0.963) Area under the curve 0.840 (0.790, 0.890) Reviewer 2 Sensitivity 0.705 (0.642, 0.762) Specificity 0.857 (0.759, 0.926) Area under the curve 0.834 (0.781, 0.882) Reviewer 3 Sensitivity 0.709 (0.647, 0.766) Specificity 0.896 (0.806, 0.954) Area under the curve 0.847 (0.793, 0.900) Table 2. Distribution of lesions by reviewer. True positive: reviewer correctly identified a true lesion and correctly classified it as being benign or malignant; type I false positive: reviewer identified a false lesion, not seen by pathology; type II false positive: reviewer incorrectly classified a benign lesion as being malignant; type I false negative: reviewer missed a true lesion; and type II
|
